Thursday, April 10, 2008

China and the Olympic flame

I just want to get in my opinion about the whole China Olympics controversy. We've been seeing it on the news long enough now, and it's time to weigh in on the subject. It isn't right to say that "it's none of my business what goes on in China." The way human dignity is treated in the world is very much every one's business.
First thing to be said is that I do agree that China's human rights record is appalling and that steps must be taken to pressure the government of that country to change its policies. As one of the most populated nations in the world, they have a responsibility to be a model for other countries.
Attacking the institution of the Olympic Games is not the way to push for change. The games are a symbol of peaceful competition, the very opposite of combat for revolution. By extinguishing the flame, the protesters have lowered themselves to the standard of those who suppress freedom, not just for Tibet, but for the populace of the country as a whole. The opportunity has been lost to violence.
A better use of the Olympic torch relay would have been to have groups of protesters along the route who would all turn their backs on the torch, and block view of it with signs which display examples of human rights violations. The object is to overshadow the games with the reality of life in China, using the torch to light the dark corners where things are hidden. In a dark room, do you turn off the flashlight when looking for the fuse box?
Violence only begets more violence. Action of the type we have seen on television should always be considered a last resort. To take that physical conflict outside of China as a means of protest is simply unacceptable. We are supposed to be the civilized ones in this debate, it is high time we started acting like it. As I said, the protesters should not be stooping to the level of the people they are complaining about.
I have great sympathy for those who are being kept down by corrupt regimes around the world. I support them in their call for change. However, violence and attacking institutions of international peace is not the way to achieve that change.
I will fight for human rights. I would willingly lay down my life to protect innocents. Attacking somebody to get media attention? That is so wrong and sick.

1 comment:

Steph said...

No one could have explained that better Uncle Joe. Perhaps you should email the protesters, yea?
protesters@hotmail.com
heehee...
Sorry...
But seriously, someone shou;d bring that up to them. Your idea was way cool, with the (its not an acronym...um...) ANALOGY of being in a dark room and turning the flashlight off to look for the fuse box. It made sense to me.